Celeron G4930 vs A6-7310

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7310
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.69
+3.7%
Celeron G4930
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
1.63

A6-7310 outperforms Celeron G4930 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7310 and Celeron G4930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20582086
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.84
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron
Power efficiency6.362.84
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-7310 and Celeron G4930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-7310 and Celeron G4930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7310 and Celeron G4930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A6-7310 and Celeron G4930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7310 and Celeron G4930 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7310 and Celeron G4930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7310 and Celeron G4930 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A6-7310 and Celeron G4930 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7310 and Celeron G4930 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
OpenGLno data4.5
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7310 and Celeron G4930.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7310 1.69
+3.7%
Celeron G4930 1.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-7310 2689
+3.7%
Celeron G4930 2594

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-7310 228
Celeron G4930 643
+182%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-7310 591
Celeron G4930 1068
+80.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 1.63
Recency 7 May 2015 23 April 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 54 Watt

A6-7310 has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 350% lower power consumption.

Celeron G4930, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-7310 and Celeron G4930.

Be aware that A6-7310 is a notebook processor while Celeron G4930 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7310 and Celeron G4930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7310
A6-7310
Intel Celeron G4930
Celeron G4930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 510 votes

Rate A6-7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 126 votes

Rate Celeron G4930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7310 or Celeron G4930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.