Athlon 64 3200+ vs A6-7310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7310
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.69
+789%
Athlon 64 3200+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.19

A6-7310 outperforms Athlon 64 3200+ by a whopping 789% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7310 and Athlon 64 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20603245
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency6.390.20
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$150

Detailed specifications

A6-7310 and Athlon 64 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512K
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-7310 and Athlon 64 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4754
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7310 and Athlon 64 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7310 and Athlon 64 3200+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7310 and Athlon 64 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7310 and Athlon 64 3200+ integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7310 and Athlon 64 3200+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7310 and Athlon 64 3200+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7310 1.69
+789%
Athlon 64 3200+ 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-7310 2689
+782%
Athlon 64 3200+ 305

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 0.19
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 89 Watt

A6-7310 has a 789.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 641.7% lower power consumption.

The A6-7310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 3200+ in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-7310 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 3200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7310 and Athlon 64 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7310
A6-7310
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Athlon 64 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 513 votes

Rate A6-7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 91 vote

Rate Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7310 or Athlon 64 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.