Athlon 64 2850e vs A6-7310
Primary details
Comparing A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2010 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
Architecture codename | Carrizo-L (2015) | Lima (2008−2009) |
Release date | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) | August 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128K |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512K |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | no data | 77 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 65 °C |
Number of transistors | 930 Million | 122 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FP4 | AM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12-25 Watt | 22 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3L-1866 | DDR2 |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 22 Watt |
A6-7310 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 83.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A6-7310 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 2850e is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7310 and Athlon 64 2850e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.