EPYC 74F3 vs A6-5357M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5357M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.75
EPYC 74F3
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
39.22
+5129%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms A6-5357M by a whopping 5129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-5357M and EPYC 74F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking256166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.16
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Milan (2021)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,900
Current price$49 $2990 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-5357M and EPYC 74F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size246 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A6-5357M and EPYC 74F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP2SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5357M and EPYC 74F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5357M and EPYC 74F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5357M and EPYC 74F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8450GN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5357M and EPYC 74F3.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-5357M 0.75
EPYC 74F3 39.22
+5129%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms A6-5357M by 5129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-5357M 1165
EPYC 74F3 60666
+5107%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms A6-5357M by 5107% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 39.22
Recency 1 June 2013 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 240 Watt

The EPYC 74F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5357M in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-5357M is a notebook processor while EPYC 74F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5357M and EPYC 74F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5357M
A6-5357M
AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate A6-5357M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5357M or EPYC 74F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.