Ultra 7 265T vs A6-5350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2651not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.08no data
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size246 mm2243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r21851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8450GArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T.

PCIe versionNot Listed5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm

Ultra 7 265T has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A6-5350M is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5350M and Core Ultra 7 265T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5350M
A6-5350M
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
Core Ultra 7 265T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 27 votes

Rate A6-5350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5350M or Core Ultra 7 265T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.