Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs A6-5350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2530not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)20 August 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$284
Current price$61 $124 (0.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus supportno data1066 MHz
L2 cache2048 KB6 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V - 1.15V

Compatibility

Information on A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8450Gno data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400.

PCIe versionNot Listedno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-5350M 1216
+60.2%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 759

A6-5350M outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by 60% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A6-5350M 2481
+15.7%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 2144

A6-5350M outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by 16% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-5350M 3956
+2.8%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 3850

A6-5350M outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-5350M 1649
+26.8%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 1300

A6-5350M outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by 27% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A6-5350M 40.86
+5.5%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 43.12

Core 2 Duo SL9400 outperforms A6-5350M by 6% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A6-5350M 1
+11.7%
Core 2 Duo SL9400 1

A6-5350M outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by 12% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2013 20 August 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

We couldn't decide between A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5350M and Core 2 Duo SL9400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5350M
A6-5350M
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
Core 2 Duo SL9400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 23 votes

Rate A6-5350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5350M or Core 2 Duo SL9400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.