Ryzen 9 7945HX vs A6-5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5200
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.08
Ryzen 9 7945HX
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
35.38
+3176%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by a whopping 3176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-5200 and Ryzen 9 7945HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking231990
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$421 no data

Detailed specifications

A6-5200 and Ryzen 9 7945HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nmCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
Die size246 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A6-5200 and Ryzen 9 7945HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3FL1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5200 and Ryzen 9 7945HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600DDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5200 and Ryzen 9 7945HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5200 and Ryzen 9 7945HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8400AMD Radeon 610M
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5200 and Ryzen 9 7945HX integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5200 and Ryzen 9 7945HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5200 and Ryzen 9 7945HX.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-5200 1.08
Ryzen 9 7945HX 35.38
+3176%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 3176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-5200 1664
Ryzen 9 7945HX 54724
+3189%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 3189% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-5200 210
Ryzen 9 7945HX 2736
+1203%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 1203% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A6-5200 597
Ryzen 9 7945HX 15809
+2548%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 2548% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A6-5200 1598
Ryzen 9 7945HX 8481
+431%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 431% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A6-5200 5600
Ryzen 9 7945HX 71582
+1178%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 1178% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A6-5200 26.1
Ryzen 9 7945HX 4.9
+433%

A6-5200 outperforms Ryzen 9 7945HX by 433% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A6-5200 2
Ryzen 9 7945HX 64
+3284%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 3284% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6-5200 156
Ryzen 9 7945HX 5541
+3452%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 3452% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A6-5200 42
Ryzen 9 7945HX 307
+624%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 624% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A6-5200 0.52
Ryzen 9 7945HX 3.65
+602%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 602% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A6-5200 1.1
Ryzen 9 7945HX 25.3
+2310%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms A6-5200 by 2310% in TrueCrypt AES.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.08 35.38
Integrated graphics card 0.69 2.86
Recency 23 May 2013 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 55 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7945HX is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5200 and Ryzen 9 7945HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5200
A6-5200
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
Ryzen 9 7945HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 185 votes

Rate A6-5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 514 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7945HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5200 or Ryzen 9 7945HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.