Celeron M 370 vs A6-5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-5200 and Celeron M 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2319not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesCeleron M
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)no data
Current price$421 $130

Detailed specifications

A6-5200 and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus supportno data400 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache2048 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on A6-5200 and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5200 and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600no data
AES-NI+no data
FMAFMA4no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A6-5200 and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5200 and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5200 and Celeron M 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels1no data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8400no data
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5200 and Celeron M 370 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5200 and Celeron M 370 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5200 and Celeron M 370.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A6-5200 26.1
+364%
Celeron M 370 121

Celeron M 370 outperforms A6-5200 by 364% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 21 Watt

We couldn't decide between A6-5200 and Celeron M 370. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5200 and Celeron M 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5200
A6-5200
Intel Celeron M 370
Celeron M 370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 185 votes

Rate A6-5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5200 or Celeron M 370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.