AMD A6-5200 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Comparing A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Manufacturing process technology
Maximum core temperature
Maximum case temperature (TCase)
64 bit support
Information on A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
Power consumption (TDP)
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500.
Supported memory types
Max memory channels
General parameters of GPUs integrated into A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500.
Number of pipelines
Available interfaces and connections of A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 integrated GPUs.
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 9.55 +0.3%
A6-5200 2660 +90%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 1400
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 1625 +1.7%
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
A6-5200 5600 +89.2%
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 2960
Let's see how good A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD A6-5200
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 65 nm)
Less power hungry (25 vs 35 watts)
SSE (Streaming SIMD Instructions - a SIMD instruction extension working with 128-bit registers)
x86-64 (a general name for 64-bit extension of x86 instruction set. There are AMD64 and Intel 64 versions that differ very little)
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption. Speeds up encryption software, e.g. Veracrypt)
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions - a set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
MMX (MultiMedia Extensions - the very first (1996) SIMD instruction expansion for Intel desktop CPUs, works with 64-bit registers)
3DNow! (older SIMD instructions set used by AMD CPUs. Supercedes MMX, works with 64-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Enduro (saves battery charge by automatically switching between an integrated and discrete AMD GPU depending on workload. Similar to NVIDIA Optimus)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
0.3% faster in synthetic tests
So, A6-5200 or Celeron Dual-Core T1500?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A6-5200 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5200 and Celeron Dual-Core T1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.