Atom C3508 vs A6-5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5200
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.95

Atom C3508 outperforms A6-5200 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27652704
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.603.94
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date23 May 2013 (12 years ago)15 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-5200 and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache256 KB224 KB
L2 cache2048 KB8 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-5200 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT3FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5200 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

A6-5200 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5200 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5200 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8400no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5200 and Atom C3508 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5200 and Atom C3508 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5200 and Atom C3508.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-5200 0.95
Atom C3508 1.05
+10.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-5200 1661
Samples: 977
Atom C3508 1831
+10.2%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 1.05
Recency 23 May 2013 15 August 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 11 Watt

Atom C3508 has a 11% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 127% lower power consumption.

The Intel Atom C3508 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-5200 is a notebook processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 237 votes

Rate A6-5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-5200 and Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.