FX-6130 vs A6-4455M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-4455M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.50
FX-6130
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.74
+448%

FX-6130 outperforms A6-4455M by a whopping 448% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-4455M and FX-6130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28911703
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.782.73
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-4455M and FX-6130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache92 KB288 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)6 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2315 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-4455M and FX-6130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP2AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4455M and FX-6130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4455M and FX-6130 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4455M and FX-6130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7500G (327 - 424 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-4455M and FX-6130.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-4455M 0.50
FX-6130 2.74
+448%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-4455M 797
FX-6130 4353
+446%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 2.74
Recency 15 May 2012 23 October 2012
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 6
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 95 Watt

A6-4455M has 458.8% lower power consumption.

FX-6130, on the other hand, has a 448% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The FX-6130 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4455M in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-4455M is a notebook processor while FX-6130 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4455M and FX-6130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-4455M
A6-4455M
AMD FX-6130
FX-6130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 44 votes

Rate A6-4455M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 14 votes

Rate FX-6130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-4455M or FX-6130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.