EPYC Embedded 3201 vs A6-4455M
Primary details
Comparing A6-4455M and EPYC Embedded 3201 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD A-Series | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-4455M and EPYC Embedded 3201 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | 92 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A6-4455M and EPYC Embedded 3201 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FP2 | AMD BGA SP4r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4455M and EPYC Embedded 3201. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4455M and EPYC Embedded 3201 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4455M and EPYC Embedded 3201. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown Dual-channel | DDR4-2133 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.13 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7500G | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-4455M and EPYC Embedded 3201.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 30 Watt |
A6-4455M has 76.5% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 3201, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A6-4455M and EPYC Embedded 3201. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A6-4455M is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3201 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4455M and EPYC Embedded 3201, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
