Apple M2 Max vs A6-4455M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-4455M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.50
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.78
+3256%

Apple M2 Max outperforms A6-4455M by a whopping 3256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-4455M and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2876385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesApple M-Series
Power efficiency2.7820.10
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)no data
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-4455M and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache92 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)36 MB
L3 cache0 KB48 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-4455M and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP2no data
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4455M and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4455M and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4455M and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7500G (327 - 424 MHz)Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-4455M 0.50
Apple M2 Max 16.78
+3256%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-4455M 797
Apple M2 Max 26658
+3245%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 16.78
Recency 15 May 2012 17 January 2023
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 79 Watt

A6-4455M has 364.7% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 3256% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4455M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4455M and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-4455M
A6-4455M
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 44 votes

Rate A6-4455M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 233 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-4455M or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.