Ryzen 9 7900X3D vs A6-3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3650
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.31
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
31.73
+2322%

Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms A6-3650 by a whopping 2322% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3650 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2272129
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.22
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency1.2324.89
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-3650 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2.6 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size228 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-3650 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1AM5
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3650 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3650 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3650 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6530DAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3650 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3650 1.31
Ryzen 9 7900X3D 31.73
+2322%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-3650 2079
Ryzen 9 7900X3D 50403
+2324%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-3650 295
Ryzen 9 7900X3D 2856
+868%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-3650 912
Ryzen 9 7900X3D 17570
+1827%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 31.73
Recency 30 June 2011 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 120 Watt

A6-3650 has 20% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7900X3D, on the other hand, has a 2322.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 7900X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3650 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3650
A6-3650
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 73 votes

Rate A6-3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 421 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 7900X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3650 or Ryzen 9 7900X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.