Athlon 1200 vs A6-3650

VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-3650 and Athlon 1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2264not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.24no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Thunderbird C (2000−2001)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)October 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3650 and Athlon 1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm180 nm
Die size228 mm2120 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million37 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-3650 and Athlon 1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1A
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt66 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3650 and Athlon 1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3650 and Athlon 1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6530Dno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 66 Watt

A6-3650 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 1200, on the other hand, has 51.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-3650 and Athlon 1200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3650 and Athlon 1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3650
A6-3650
AMD Athlon 1200
Athlon 1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 73 votes

Rate A6-3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Athlon 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3650 or Athlon 1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.