Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs A6-3650
Aggregate performance score
M3 Max 14-Core outperforms A6-3650 by a whopping 1638% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2586 | 339 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M3 |
| Power efficiency | 0.51 | 11.28 |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | no data |
| Release date | 30 June 2011 (14 years ago) | 30 October 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of A6-3650 and M3 Max 14-Core: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.748 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 4.06 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 92000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A6-3650 and M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 78 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3650 and M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3650 and M3 Max 14-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon HD 6530D | Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.20 | 20.85 |
| Recency | 30 June 2011 | 30 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 14 |
| Threads | 4 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 78 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 14-Core has a 1638% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, a 967% more advanced lithography process, and 28% lower power consumption.
The Apple M3 Max 14-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-3650 in performance tests.
Note that A6-3650 is a desktop processor while Apple M3 Max 14-Core is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
