Pentium D 960 vs A6-3500

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3500
2011
3 cores / 3 threads, 65 Watt
0.89
+74.5%
Pentium D 960
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.51

A6-3500 outperforms Pentium D 960 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3500 and Pentium D 960 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25542887
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.300.37
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Presler (2005−2007)
Release date17 August 2011 (13 years ago)23 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$523

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-3500 and Pentium D 960 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads32
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)16 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per die)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size228 mm22x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million376 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on A6-3500 and Pentium D 960 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1LGA775,PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3500 and Pentium D 960. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A6-3500 and Pentium D 960 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3500 and Pentium D 960 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3500 and Pentium D 960. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6530DOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3500 0.89
+74.5%
Pentium D 960 0.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-3500 1420
+76%
Pentium D 960 807

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 0.51
Recency 17 August 2011 23 April 2006
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

A6-3500 has a 74.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The A6-3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium D 960 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3500 and Pentium D 960, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3500
A6-3500
Intel Pentium D 960
Pentium D 960

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 128 votes

Rate A6-3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 46 votes

Rate Pentium D 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3500 or Pentium D 960, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.