Xeon D-2896NT vs A6-3400M

VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-3400M and Xeon D-2896NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2668not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.03no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)no data
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3400M and Xeon D-2896NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads440
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB30 MB
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-3400M and Xeon D-2896NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt117 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3400M and Xeon D-2896NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480GIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A6-3400M and Xeon D-2896NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3400M and Xeon D-2896NT are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3400M and Xeon D-2896NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3400M and Xeon D-2896NT.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data32
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 1 October 2023
Physical cores 4 20
Threads 4 40
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 117 Watt

A6-3400M has 234.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2896NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between A6-3400M and Xeon D-2896NT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A6-3400M is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2896NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3400M and Xeon D-2896NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3400M
A6-3400M
Intel Xeon D-2896NT
Xeon D-2896NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 174 votes

Rate A6-3400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2896NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3400M or Xeon D-2896NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.