Ryzen 7 7800X vs A6-3400M
Primary details
Comparing A6-3400M and Ryzen 7 7800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2647 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD A-Series | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 2.03 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Zen 4 |
| Release date | 14 June 2011 (13 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-3400M and Ryzen 7 7800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 96 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | 71+122 mm |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A6-3400M and Ryzen 7 7800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FS1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 7 7800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 7 7800X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3400M and Ryzen 7 7800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6520G | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 120 Watt |
A6-3400M has 242.9% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 7800X, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A6-3400M and Ryzen 7 7800X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A6-3400M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 7800X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3400M and Ryzen 7 7800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
