Athlon Silver 7120U vs A6-3400M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3400M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.75
Athlon Silver 7120U
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.98
+164%

Athlon Silver 7120U outperforms A6-3400M by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3400M and Athlon Silver 7120U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26631937
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.0212.43
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3400M and Athlon Silver 7120U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size228 mm2100 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-3400M and Athlon Silver 7120U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3400M and Athlon Silver 7120U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480GXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3400M and Athlon Silver 7120U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3400M and Athlon Silver 7120U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3400M and Athlon Silver 7120U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3400M 0.75
Athlon Silver 7120U 1.98
+164%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-3400M 1193
Athlon Silver 7120U 3145
+164%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-3400M 211
Athlon Silver 7120U 966
+358%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-3400M 522
Athlon Silver 7120U 1596
+206%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 1.98
Integrated graphics card 0.78 2.85
Recency 14 June 2011 20 September 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

A6-3400M has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon Silver 7120U, on the other hand, has a 164% higher aggregate performance score, 265.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Silver 7120U is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3400M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3400M and Athlon Silver 7120U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3400M
A6-3400M
AMD Athlon Silver 7120U
Athlon Silver 7120U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 172 votes

Rate A6-3400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 300 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 7120U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3400M or Athlon Silver 7120U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.