A6-3410MX vs A4 PRO-7300B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4 PRO-7300B
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.92
+15%
A6-3410MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.80

A4 PRO-7300B outperforms A6-3410MX by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4 PRO-7300B and A6-3410MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25342623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.341.68
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Llano (2011−2012)
Release dateAugust 2014 (10 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4 PRO-7300B and A6-3410MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache96 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on A4 PRO-7300B and A6-3410MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FS1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4 PRO-7300B and A6-3410MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4 PRO-7300B and A6-3410MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4 PRO-7300B and A6-3410MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8470DAMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)
จำนวนพาธไลน์192no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4 PRO-7300B and A6-3410MX integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4 PRO-7300B and A6-3410MX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4 PRO-7300B and A6-3410MX.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4 PRO-7300B 0.92
+15%
A6-3410MX 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4 PRO-7300B 1458
+15.4%
A6-3410MX 1263

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.92 0.80
Integrated graphics card 0.97 0.78
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

A4 PRO-7300B has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, and 24.4% faster integrated GPU.

A6-3410MX, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The A4 PRO-7300B is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3410MX in performance tests.

Note that A4 PRO-7300B is a desktop processor while A6-3410MX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4 PRO-7300B and A6-3410MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4 PRO-7300B
A4 PRO-7300B
AMD A6-3410MX
A6-3410MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 37 votes

Rate A4 PRO-7300B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 46 votes

Rate A6-3410MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4 PRO-7300B or A6-3410MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.