Xeon w3-2525 vs A4 PRO-3340B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4 PRO-3340B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.06
Xeon w3-2525
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 175 Watt
16.47
+1454%

Xeon w3-2525 outperforms A4 PRO-3340B by a whopping 1454% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2564450
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.07
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency4.089.06
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date20 December 2014 (10 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$609

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon w3-2525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Threads416
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data22.5 MB
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C72 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon w3-2525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt175 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon w3-2525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon w3-2525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon w3-2525 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon w3-2525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-1600DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channels14
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8240 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count2no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon w3-2525 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon w3-2525 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon w3-2525.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A4 PRO-3340B 1.06
Xeon w3-2525 16.47
+1454%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A4 PRO-3340B 1709
Xeon w3-2525 26480
+1449%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 16.47
Recency 20 December 2014 24 August 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 175 Watt

A4 PRO-3340B has 600% lower power consumption.

Xeon w3-2525, on the other hand, has a 1453.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon w3-2525 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4 PRO-3340B in performance tests.

Be aware that A4 PRO-3340B is a notebook processor while Xeon w3-2525 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4 PRO-3340B
A4 PRO-3340B
Intel Xeon w3-2525
Xeon w3-2525

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate A4 PRO-3340B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w3-2525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A4 PRO-3340B and Xeon w3-2525, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.