EPYC Embedded 8224P vs A4 PRO-3340B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4 PRO-3340B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.98
EPYC Embedded 8224P
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 160 Watt
27.92
+2749%

EPYC Embedded 8224P outperforms A4 PRO-3340B by a whopping 2749% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2742224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency1.657.36
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesTSMC
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date20 December 2014 (11 years ago)18 September 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4 PRO-3340B and EPYC Embedded 8224P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.55 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size107 mm22x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C75 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,750 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A4 PRO-3340B and EPYC Embedded 8224P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3SP6
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt160 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4 PRO-3340B and EPYC Embedded 8224P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4 PRO-3340B and EPYC Embedded 8224P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4 PRO-3340B and EPYC Embedded 8224P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-1600DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8240 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count2no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4 PRO-3340B and EPYC Embedded 8224P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4 PRO-3340B and EPYC Embedded 8224P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4 PRO-3340B and EPYC Embedded 8224P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes896

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A4 PRO-3340B 0.98
EPYC Embedded 8224P 27.92
+2749%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A4 PRO-3340B 1719
Samples: 9
EPYC Embedded 8224P 48869
+2743%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.98 27.92
Recency 20 December 2014 18 September 2023
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 160 Watt

A4 PRO-3340B has 540% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8224P, on the other hand, has a 2749% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4 PRO-3340B in performance tests.

Be aware that A4 PRO-3340B is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 8224P is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate A4 PRO-3340B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A4 PRO-3340B and EPYC Embedded 8224P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.