E1 Micro-6200T vs A4 Micro-6400T

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4 Micro-6400T
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
0.68
+78.9%
E1 Micro-6200T
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 3 Watt
0.38

A4 Micro-6400T outperforms E1 Micro-6200T by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4 Micro-6400T and E1 Micro-6200T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27233014
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD E-Series
Power efficiency14.309.10
Architecture codenameMullins (2014)Mullins (2014)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4 Micro-6400T and E1 Micro-6200T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.4 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4 Micro-6400T and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bFT3b
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt3.95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4 Micro-6400T and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4 Micro-6400T and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4 Micro-6400T and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4 Micro-6400T and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4 Micro-6400T and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4 Micro-6400T and E1 Micro-6200T.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4 Micro-6400T 0.68
+78.9%
E1 Micro-6200T 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4 Micro-6400T 1082
+80.3%
E1 Micro-6200T 600

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 0.38
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 3 Watt

A4 Micro-6400T has a 78.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

E1 Micro-6200T, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

The A4 Micro-6400T is our recommended choice as it beats the E1 Micro-6200T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4 Micro-6400T and E1 Micro-6200T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4 Micro-6400T
A4 Micro-6400T
AMD E1 Micro-6200T
E1 Micro-6200T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate A4 Micro-6400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 29 votes

Rate E1 Micro-6200T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4 Micro-6400T or E1 Micro-6200T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.