Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs A4-9125 SoC

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesTSMC
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Shimada Peak (2025)
Release dateApril 2017 (8 years ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.3 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache160 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size125 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT4sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R3 2CUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 350 Watt

A4-9125 SoC has 2233.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD A4-9125 SoC and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A4-9125 SoC is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-9125 SoC
A4-9125 SoC
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 73 votes

Rate A4-9125 SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.