Processor 300T vs A4-7300

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-7300
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96
Processor 300T
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
3.87
+303%

Processor 300T outperforms A4-7300 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-7300 and Processor 300T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25291472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.4110.54
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateAugust 2014 (10 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

A4-7300 and Processor 300T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache96 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A4-7300 and Processor 300T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM21700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-7300 and Processor 300T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A4-7300 and Processor 300T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-7300 and Processor 300T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-7300 and Processor 300T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4, DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8470DIntel UHD Graphics 710
จำนวนพาธไลน์192no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-7300 and Processor 300T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-7300 and Processor 300T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-7300 and Processor 300T.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-7300 0.96
Processor 300T 3.87
+303%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-7300 1532
Processor 300T 6205
+305%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 3.87
Integrated graphics card 0.96 2.83
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Processor 300T has a 303.1% higher aggregate performance score, 194.8% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Processor 300T is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-7300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-7300 and Processor 300T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-7300
A4-7300
Intel Processor 300T
Processor 300T

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 98 votes

Rate A4-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Processor 300T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-7300 or Processor 300T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.