EPYC 7373X vs A4-7210
Primary details
Comparing A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2425 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
Power efficiency | 3.94 | no data |
Architecture codename | Carrizo-L (2015) | Milan-X (2022) |
Release date | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 32 |
Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 768 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Die size | no data | 8x 81 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 930 Million | 33,200 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
Socket | FT3b | SP3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12-25 Watt | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | + | + |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-3200 |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 7 May 2015 | 22 March 2022 |
Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
Threads | 4 | 32 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 240 Watt |
A4-7210 has 1900% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7373X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A4-7210 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7373X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4-7210 and EPYC 7373X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.