Core 2 Duo T7700 vs A4-7210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-7210
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.07
+75.4%

A4-7210 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7700 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23232685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)2 September 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$307
Current price$177 $143 (0.5x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache2048 KB4 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors930 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bPBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+no data
FMAFMA4no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R3 Graphicsno data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-7210 1.07
+75.4%
Core 2 Duo T7700 0.61

A4-7210 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7700 by 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-7210 1661
+75.8%
Core 2 Duo T7700 945

A4-7210 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7700 by 76% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-7210 214
Core 2 Duo T7700 253
+18.2%

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms A4-7210 by 18% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-7210 588
+45.2%
Core 2 Duo T7700 405

A4-7210 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7700 by 45% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A4-7210 1732
Core 2 Duo T7700 2554
+47.4%

Core 2 Duo T7700 outperforms A4-7210 by 47% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-7210 5593
+21.1%
Core 2 Duo T7700 4620

A4-7210 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7700 by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-7210 2681
+30.3%
Core 2 Duo T7700 2058

A4-7210 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7700 by 30% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.07 0.61
Recency 7 May 2015 2 September 2007
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

The A4-7210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T7700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-7210 and Core 2 Duo T7700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-7210
A4-7210
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
Core 2 Duo T7700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 144 votes

Rate A4-7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 79 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-7210 or Core 2 Duo T7700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.