Celeron G1630 vs A4-7210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-7210
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.04
Celeron G1630
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
1.07
+2.9%

Celeron G1630 outperforms A4-7210 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-7210 and Celeron G1630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24442424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.08
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.931.84
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-7210 and Celeron G1630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data94 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-7210 and Celeron G1630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-7210 and Celeron G1630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A4-7210 and Celeron G1630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-7210 and Celeron G1630 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-7210 and Celeron G1630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-7210 and Celeron G1630 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-7210 and Celeron G1630 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-7210 and Celeron G1630.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-7210 1.04
Celeron G1630 1.07
+2.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-7210 1656
Celeron G1630 1707
+3.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-7210 201
Celeron G1630 504
+151%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-7210 522
Celeron G1630 937
+79.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 1.07
Recency 7 May 2015 1 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 55 Watt

A4-7210 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 358.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron G1630, on the other hand, has a 2.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A4-7210 and Celeron G1630.

Be aware that A4-7210 is a notebook processor while Celeron G1630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-7210 and Celeron G1630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-7210
A4-7210
Intel Celeron G1630
Celeron G1630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 161 vote

Rate A4-7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate Celeron G1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-7210 or Celeron G1630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.