Xeon w5-2545 vs A4-6320

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6320
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96
Xeon w5-2545
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 210 Watt
26.24
+2633%

Xeon w5-2545 outperforms A4-6320 by a whopping 2633% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2487183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data83.29
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.4011.83
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateDecember 2013 (10 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache96 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channels24
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8370DN/A
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6320 0.96
Xeon w5-2545 26.24
+2633%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6320 1530
Xeon w5-2545 41688
+2625%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 26.24
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 210 Watt

A4-6320 has 223.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-2545, on the other hand, has a 2633.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Xeon w5-2545 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6320 in performance tests.

Note that A4-6320 is a desktop processor while Xeon w5-2545 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6320 and Xeon w5-2545, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6320
A4-6320
Intel Xeon w5-2545
Xeon w5-2545

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate A4-6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon w5-2545 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6320 or Xeon w5-2545, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.