Xeon E-2478 vs A4-6320

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6320
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96
Xeon E-2478
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
18.78
+1856%

Xeon E-2478 outperforms A4-6320 by a whopping 1856% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2488313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data82.67
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.4022.22
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateDecember 2013 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$568

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache96 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8370DN/A
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478.

PCIe version2.05
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6320 0.96
Xeon E-2478 18.78
+1856%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6320 1530
Xeon E-2478 29827
+1849%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 18.78
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 80 Watt

A4-6320 has 23.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2478, on the other hand, has a 1856.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Xeon E-2478 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6320 in performance tests.

Note that A4-6320 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2478 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6320 and Xeon E-2478, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6320
A4-6320
Intel Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate A4-6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2478 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6320 or Xeon E-2478, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.