Ultra 9 185H vs A4-6300B
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A4-6300B by a whopping 2104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A4-6300B and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2593 | 324 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Meteor Lake-H |
| Power efficiency | 1.22 | 38.93 |
| Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| Release date | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $640 |
Detailed specifications
A4-6300B and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 22 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 110 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A4-6300B and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM2 | Intel BGA 2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6300B and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
A4-6300B and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6300B and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6300B and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon HD 8370D | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2350 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6300B and Core Ultra 9 185H.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.84 | 18.51 |
| Recency | 1 June 2013 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 22 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ultra 9 185H has a 2103.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1000% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.
The Core Ultra 9 185H is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6300B in performance tests.
Note that A4-6300B is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 185H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6300B and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
