Celeron 1020E vs A4-6300

Primary details

Comparing A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2429	2438
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.15	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron
Architecture codename	Richland (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date	1 June 2013 (11 years ago)	20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price	$36	$27

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	3.7 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.9 GHz	2.2 GHz
L1 cache	96 KB	64K (per core)
L2 cache	1024 KB	256K (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	22 nm
Die size	246 mm2	118 mm2
Maximum core temperature	70 °C	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	70 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	1,178 million	1,400 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FM2	G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	1	no data
FMA	FMA4	no data
AVX	AVX	no data
PowerTune	-	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
PowerNow	+	no data
PowerGating	+	no data
Out-of-band client management	-	no data
VirusProtect	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	+

Security technologies

A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-x	no data	+
IOMMU 2.0	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1600	DDR3
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon™ HD 8370D	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Number of pipelines	128	no data
Enduro	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data
UVD	+	no data
VCE	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX

DirectX® 11

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6300 outperforms Celeron 1020E by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.92	0.91
Recency	1 June 2013	20 January 2013
Chip lithography	32 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6300 and Celeron 1020E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---