Ryzen 3 4300U vs A4-5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5000
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
Ryzen 3 4300U
2020
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
4.81
+473%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by a whopping 473% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5000 and Ryzen 3 4300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24811191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$248 $520

Detailed specifications

A4-5000 and Ryzen 3 4300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-5000 and Ryzen 3 4300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5000 and Ryzen 3 4300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5000 and Ryzen 3 4300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5000 and Ryzen 3 4300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8330AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-5000 and Ryzen 3 4300U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-5000 and Ryzen 3 4300U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5000 and Ryzen 3 4300U.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5000 0.84
Ryzen 3 4300U 4.81
+473%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 473% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-5000 1295
Ryzen 3 4300U 7445
+475%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 475% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-5000 161
Ryzen 3 4300U 1246
+674%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 674% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-5000 481
Ryzen 3 4300U 3364
+599%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 599% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-5000 2039
Ryzen 3 4300U 6068
+198%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 198% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A4-5000 119
Ryzen 3 4300U 563
+373%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 373% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A4-5000 33
Ryzen 3 4300U 164
+397%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 397% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5000 0.9
Ryzen 3 4300U 3.2
+248%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 248% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5000 1078
Ryzen 3 4300U 2397
+122%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 122% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5000 9
Ryzen 3 4300U 35
+301%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 301% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A4-5000 41
Ryzen 3 4300U 172
+317%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 317% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A4-5000 2762
Ryzen 3 4300U 13134
+376%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 376% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A4-5000 870
Ryzen 3 4300U 4042
+365%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 365% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A4-5000 3041
Ryzen 3 4300U 11281
+271%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms A4-5000 by 271% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 4.81
Integrated graphics card 0.67 4.67
Recency 23 May 2013 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The Ryzen 3 4300U is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-5000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5000 and Ryzen 3 4300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5000
A4-5000
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
Ryzen 3 4300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 342 votes

Rate A4-5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 915 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5000 or Ryzen 3 4300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.