EPYC 9654 vs A4-4355M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A4-4355M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads
0.51
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
77.72
+15139%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A4-4355M by 15139% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing A4-4355M and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking27284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data10.18
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Genoa
Release date27 September 2012 (11 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$210 $4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

A4-4355M and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache96 KB6 MB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)96 MB
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size246 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-4355M and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-4355M and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-4355M and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-4355M and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7400Gno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-4355M and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-4355M 0.51
EPYC 9654 77.72
+15139%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A4-4355M by 15139% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-4355M 806
EPYC 9654 122091
+15048%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A4-4355M by 15048% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-4355M 239
EPYC 9654 1829
+665%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A4-4355M by 665% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-4355M 359
EPYC 9654 18566
+5072%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A4-4355M by 5072% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.51 77.72
Recency 27 September 2012 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4355M in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-4355M is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-4355M and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-4355M
A4-4355M
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate A4-4355M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 979 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A4-4355M or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.