Atom C3758 vs A4-4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-4000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.72
Atom C3758
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
2.90
+303%

Atom C3758 outperforms A4-4000 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-4000 and Atom C3758 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27031665
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.54
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.0510.97
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-4000 and Atom C3758 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache128 KB (per core)448 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data82 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-4000 and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-4000 and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

A4-4000 and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-4000 and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-4000 and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7480Dno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-4000 and Atom C3758.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-4000 0.72
Atom C3758 2.90
+303%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-4000 1146
Atom C3758 4614
+303%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 2.90
Recency 1 June 2013 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 25 Watt

Atom C3758 has a 302.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The Atom C3758 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4000 in performance tests.

Note that A4-4000 is a desktop processor while Atom C3758 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-4000 and Atom C3758, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-4000
A4-4000
Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 368 votes

Rate A4-4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-4000 or Atom C3758, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.