Processor N200 vs A4-3400

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3400
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.69
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56
+126%

Processor N200 outperforms A4-3400 by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3400 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27332123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency1.0024.61
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date7 September 2011 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

A4-3400 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.7 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-3400 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3400 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A4-3400 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3400 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3400 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6410DIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3400 and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 1.56
Recency 7 September 2011 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N200 has a 126.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3400 in performance tests.

Note that A4-3400 is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3400 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3400
A4-3400
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 83 votes

Rate A4-3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3400 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.