Atom Z2460 vs A4-3330MX
General info
Comparing A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Penwell (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 20 December 2011 (12 years ago) | 1 January 2012 (12 years ago) |
Technical specs
A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | 65 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FS1 | FC-MB4617 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480G | Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| GPIO | no data | 152 |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6480G | PowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz) |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
| HDMI | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460.
| USB revision | no data | 2.0 OTG |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 1 |
| UART | no data | 3 |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 3 Watt |
We couldn't decide between A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3330MX and Atom Z2460, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
