i9-14901TE vs A4-3305M
Primary details
Comparing A4-3305M and Core i9-14901TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2922 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.27 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 14 June 2011 (13 years ago) | July 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
A4-3305M and Core i9-14901TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 36 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A4-3305M and Core i9-14901TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FS1 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3305M and Core i9-14901TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
A4-3305M and Core i9-14901TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3305M and Core i9-14901TE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3305M and Core i9-14901TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6480G (593 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3305M and Core i9-14901TE.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.66 | 6.16 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
A4-3305M has 28.6% lower power consumption.
i9-14901TE, on the other hand, has 833.3% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A4-3305M and Core i9-14901TE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A4-3305M is a notebook processor while Core i9-14901TE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3305M and Core i9-14901TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
