Celeron N4020 vs A4-3305M
Primary details
Comparing A4-3305M and Celeron N4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2370 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 56 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD A-Series | Intel Gemini Lake |
Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) |
Release date | 14 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 November 2019 (4 years ago) |
Current price | $14.93 | $236 |
Detailed specifications
A4-3305M and Celeron N4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 128K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A4-3305M and Celeron N4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FS1 | FCBGA1090 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3305M and Celeron N4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480G | Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Smart Response | no data | - |
GPIO | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
A4-3305M and Celeron N4020 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
MPX | no data | + |
Identity Protection | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3305M and Celeron N4020 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3305M and Celeron N4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6480G | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 650 MHz |
Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A4-3305M and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | no data | + |
HDMI | no data | + |
MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by A4-3305M and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2160@30Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A4-3305M and Celeron N4020 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3305M and Celeron N4020.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 2 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
Integrated LAN | no data | - |
UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron N4020 outperforms A4-3305M by 111% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron N4020 outperforms A4-3305M by 45% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron N4020 outperforms A4-3305M by 51% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Celeron N4020 outperforms A4-3305M by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron N4020 outperforms A4-3305M by 30% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron N4020 outperforms A4-3305M by 55% in 3DMark06 CPU.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
A4-3305M outperforms Celeron N4020 by 36% in wPrime 32.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Celeron N4020 outperforms A4-3305M by 53% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Celeron N4020 outperforms A4-3305M by 68% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.66 | 0.86 |
Recency | 14 June 2011 | 4 November 2019 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
We couldn't decide between A4-3305M and Celeron N4020. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3305M and Celeron N4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.