Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs A4-3300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.55
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
31.48
+5624%

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 outperforms A4-3300 by a whopping 5624% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3127174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.3624.15
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Strix Halo (2025−2026)
Release date7 September 2011 (14 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of A4-3300 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size228 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1FP11
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3300 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6410DAMD Radeon 8060S

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3300 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A4-3300 0.55
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 31.48
+5624%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A4-3300 982
Samples: 211
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 55104
+5511%
Samples: 909

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-3300 227
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 2761
+1116%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-3300 397
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 17583
+4329%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 31.48
Recency 7 September 2011 6 January 2025
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has a 5624% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 18% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-3300 in performance tests.

Note that A4-3300 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 137 votes

Rate A4-3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 173 votes

Rate Ryzen AI Max 395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A4-3300 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.