GX-210JA vs A4-1350

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-1350
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.57
+256%
GX-210JA
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.16

A4-1350 outperforms GX-210JA by a whopping 256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-1350 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28253305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD
Power efficiency6.742.52
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Temash (2013)
Release date18 October 2013 (11 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-1350 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed1 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-1350 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3FT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-1350 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-1350 and GX-210JA are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-1350 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8210 (300 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-1350 0.57
+256%
GX-210JA 0.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-1350 911
+267%
GX-210JA 248

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.16
Recency 18 October 2013 23 May 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 6 Watt

A4-1350 has a 256.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

GX-210JA, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The A4-1350 is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-1350 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-1350
A4-1350
AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate A4-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-1350 or GX-210JA, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.