FX-4320 vs A12-9800E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9800E
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.25
+10.3%

AMD A12-9800E outperforms AMD FX-4320 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800E and FX-4320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18091899
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.26no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$105no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9800E and FX-4320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache2048 KB4096 KB
L3 cache0 KB4096 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800E and FX-4320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800E and FX-4320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800E and FX-4320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800E and FX-4320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3-1866
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800E and FX-4320 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800E and FX-4320 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800E and FX-4320.

PCIe version3.0Not Listed
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9800E 2.25
+10.3%
FX-4320 2.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A12-9800E 3471
+10.5%
FX-4320 3140

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.25 2.04
Recency 27 July 2017 23 October 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

A12-9800E has a 10.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The A12-9800E is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800E and FX-4320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800E
A12-9800E
AMD FX-4320
FX-4320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 49 votes

Rate A12-9800E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 132 votes

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800E or FX-4320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.