Celeron N4500 vs A12-9800E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9800E
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.19
+76.6%
Celeron N4500
2021
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.24

A12-9800E outperforms Celeron N4500 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800E and Celeron N4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18532318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.80no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency5.9219.56
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$105no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9800E and Celeron N4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.8 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800E and Celeron N4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4BGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800E and Celeron N4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

A12-9800E and Celeron N4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800E and Celeron N4500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800E and Celeron N4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics
iGPU core count8no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800E and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A12-9800E and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800E and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
OpenGLno data4.5
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800E and Celeron N4500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes88
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9800E 2.19
+76.6%
Celeron N4500 1.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A12-9800E 3471
+76.6%
Celeron N4500 1966

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A12-9800E 656
+46.8%
Celeron N4500 447

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A12-9800E 1512
+107%
Celeron N4500 731

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.19 1.24
Recency 27 July 2017 11 January 2021
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

A12-9800E has a 76.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron N4500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The A12-9800E is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4500 in performance tests.

Note that A12-9800E is a desktop processor while Celeron N4500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800E and Celeron N4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800E
A12-9800E
Intel Celeron N4500
Celeron N4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 49 votes

Rate A12-9800E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 750 votes

Rate Celeron N4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800E or Celeron N4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.