Processor U300 vs A12-9800
Aggregate performance score
Processor U300 outperforms A12-9800 by a whopping 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2071 | 1388 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.47 | 17.94 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Raptor Lake-U |
| Power efficiency | 3.45 | 35.60 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| Release date | 27 July 2017 (8 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | $193 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Processor U300 has 3717% better value for money than A12-9800.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
A12-9800 and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 55 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A12-9800 and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800 and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
A12-9800 and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800 and Processor U300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800 and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz) |
| iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800 and Processor U300 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A12-9800 and Processor U300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800 and Processor U300.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.09 | 4.98 |
| Recency | 27 July 2017 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 5 |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Processor U300 has a 138.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 25% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
The Intel Processor U300 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A12-9800 in performance tests.
Note that A12-9800 is a desktop processor while Processor U300 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
