PRO A10-8750B vs A12-9800

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800 and PRO A10-8750B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1717	1902
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.65	0.19
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Godaveri (2014−2018)
Release date	27 July 2017 (6 years ago)	29 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	no data
Current price	$95 (0.7x MSRP)	$190

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A12-9800 has 1295% better value for money than PRO A10-8750B.

Detailed specifications

A12-9800 and PRO A10-8750B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.8 GHz	3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.2 GHz	4 GHz
L2 cache	2048 KB	4096 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Die size	246 mm2	245 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	72 °C
Number of transistors	1,178 million	2,411 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800 and PRO A10-8750B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM4	FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800 and PRO A10-8750B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	+
AVX	+	+
FRTC	1	1
FreeSync	1	1
PowerTune	+	+
DualGraphics	no data	1
TrueAudio	+	+
PowerNow	+	+
PowerGating	+	+
Out-of-band client management	no data	+
VirusProtect	+	+
RAID	no data	+
HSA	no data	1

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800 and PRO A10-8750B are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
IOMMU 2.0	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800 and PRO A10-8750B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR3-2133
Max memory channels	2	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count	8	8
Number of pipelines	no data	512
Enduro	+	+
Switchable graphics	no data	1
UVD	+	+
VCE	+	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800 and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	+
HDMI	+	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800 and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	1	1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800 and PRO A10-8750B.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	8	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9800 outperforms PRO A10-8750B by 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.33	1.86
Recency	27 July 2017	29 September 2015
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800 and PRO A10-8750B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---