Core m7-6Y75 vs A12-9800

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1717	2065
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.65	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Core m7
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date	27 July 2017 (6 years ago)	1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	$393
Current price	$95 (0.7x MSRP)	$773 (2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.8 GHz	1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.2 GHz	3.1 GHz
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	2048 KB	512 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	4 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Die size	246 mm2	99 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,178 million	1750 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM4	FCBGA1515
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	+
FRTC	1	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
PowerNow	+	no data
PowerGating	+	no data
VirusProtect	+	no data
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
My WiFi	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	+
TSX	no data	+
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	+
Flex Memory Access	no data	+
SIPP	no data	+
Smart Response	no data	+
Status	no data	Discontinued

Security technologies

A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	no data	+
Secure Key	no data	+
MPX	no data	+
SGX	no data	Yes with Intel® ME
OS Guard	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR3
Maximum memory size	no data	16 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	29.8 GB/s
ECC memory support	no data	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 515
iGPU core count	8	no data
Max video memory	no data	16 GB
Quick Sync Video	no data	+
Clear Video	no data	+
Clear Video HD	no data	+
Enduro	+	no data
UVD	+	no data
VCE	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	no data	1 GHz
InTru 3D	no data	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	no data	3
eDP	no data	+
DisplayPort	+	+
HDMI	+	+
DVI	no data	+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	no data	+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	no data	4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP	no data	3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	no data	3840x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12
OpenGL	no data	4.5
Vulkan	1	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	8	10

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9800 outperforms Core m7-6Y75 by 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.33	1.49
Recency	27 July 2017	1 September 2015
Physical cores	4	2
Cost	$139	$393
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	4 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800 and Core m7-6Y75, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---