Athlon PRO 200GE vs A12-9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9800
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.33
Athlon PRO 200GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.54
+9%

Athlon PRO 200GE outperforms A12-9800 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17171658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6510.10
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)6 September 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139no data
Current price$95 (0.7x MSRP)$70

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon PRO 200GE has 281% better value for money than A12-9800.

Detailed specifications

A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 3
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9800 2.33
Athlon PRO 200GE 2.54
+9%

Athlon PRO 200GE outperforms A12-9800 by 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A12-9800 3597
Athlon PRO 200GE 3926
+9.1%

Athlon PRO 200GE outperforms A12-9800 by 9% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.33 2.54
Recency 27 July 2017 6 September 2018
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800 and Athlon PRO 200GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800
A12-9800
AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
Athlon PRO 200GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 194 votes

Rate A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 21 vote

Rate Athlon PRO 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800 or Athlon PRO 200GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.