A10-9700 vs A12-9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9800
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.27
+1.8%
A10-9700
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.23

A12-9800 outperforms A10-9700 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800 and A10-9700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18231836
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.463.64
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.313.25
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139$90

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A10-9700 has 149% better value for money than A12-9800.

Detailed specifications

A12-9800 and A10-9700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.8 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB2048 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800 and A10-9700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800 and A10-9700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC++
FreeSync++
PowerTune++
TrueAudio++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800 and A10-9700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800 and A10-9700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2400
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count86
Enduro++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800 and A10-9700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800 and A10-9700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800 and A10-9700.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes88

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9800 2.27
+1.8%
A10-9700 2.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A12-9800 3611
+1.8%
A10-9700 3547

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A12-9800 693
+7.8%
A10-9700 643

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A12-9800 1673
+6.8%
A10-9700 1567

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.27 2.23

A12-9800 has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A12-9800 and A10-9700.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800 and A10-9700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800
A12-9800
AMD A10-9700
A10-9700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 197 votes

Rate A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 415 votes

Rate A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800 or A10-9700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.