Threadripper PRO 7955WX vs A12-9720P
Primary details
Comparing A12-9720P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2055 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.54 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 19 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,899 |
Detailed specifications
A12-9720P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | 13,140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A12-9720P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9720P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9720P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9720P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9720P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 19 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 350 Watt |
A12-9720P has 2233.3% lower power consumption.
Threadripper PRO 7955WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A12-9720P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A12-9720P is a notebook processor while Threadripper PRO 7955WX is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9720P and Threadripper PRO 7955WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
